[交流] 1940年舊相片出現未來人?

上圖是在加拿大博物館的1940's舊照片 留意 太陽眼鏡 ,T shirt , 有帽運動外衣(紅圈部份), 手持數位照相機digital camera (綠圈部份),圖片中出現這樣一個人這些現代化的東西在1940 年那年代根本不可能出現 , 所以被認為可能是未來旅行者time traveler。 附上原文如下 “Reopening of the South Fork Bridge after flood in Nov. 1940. 1941 (?)” It’s the short description for the photograph shown at the virtual Bralorne Pioneer Museum, from British Columbia, Canada. The image can be seen specifically on this page (scroll down to the middle), among other items of the online exhibit. Did you notice anything out of place? Or perhaps, out of time? The man with what appears to be very modern sunglasses seems to be wearing a stamped T-shirt with a nice sweater, all the while holding a portable compact camera! Internet people reached to the obvious conclusion: it’s a time traveller caught on camera on 1940! Finally, we have proof! If the story seems straight out of a movie and the photo is in itself a great funny find, the most amusing thing i came up with while looking into this – as an Internet person, on the Internet – was the reply for a skeptical, or perhaps somewhat cynical comment on how spurious it would seem the idea that a time traveler would want to visit the reopening of a bridge in some small town in Canada. Read this on Doc Brown’s voice: “Of course, because we know nothing happened there right? But if we are considering time travel, how can we know if in some other timeline something historical happened right there?” Indeed! Once you consider time travel, everything changes. But before writing Hollywood scripts, let’s get back to reality and ask again: is the photo evidence of a time traveller? The sourceAs noted, the image is indeed available through the official website for Canada’s museums. It was part of the exhibit “Their Past Lives Here” from Bralorne-Pioneer, available to the public since 2004. It was put online since February this year, perhaps before that. And the peculiar “time traveller” image was only noted as such in the end of March, when it was linked on main websites such as Above Top Secret and FARK. Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job. So, how do we explain the man out of time? 00:19 編輯 ]

强贴 不顶对不起自己 00:19 編輯 ]

确实有些怪怪的、

強帖 頂了才對得起自己 00:19 編輯 ]

敢挂在博物馆的 怕是不敢弄假吧 顶未来酷哥！！！！ 00:19 編輯 ]

现在什么不能合成！ 00:19 編輯 ]

我来翻译 1940 年 11 月重新洪水后的南桥叉。 1941 （?）" 这是在从加拿大加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省，虚拟 Bralorne 先锋博物馆展出的照片在简短描述。 图像可见专门在此页上 （滚动到中间)，在其他物品中的在线图片展。 你注意到什么地方吗？ 或也许，出的时间？ 看来是非常现代的太阳镜的人似乎身穿一件好的毛衣冲压的 t，同时持有一个便携式小型相机 ！ 互联网人达到明显的结论: 是旅客对 1940年着火相机的时候 ！ 最后，我们必须证明 ！ 如果这个故事似乎直出的影片和照片本身就是一个重要的有趣发现，最有趣的事我提出了同时看这 — — 作为一个互联网的人 在互联网上 – 是持怀疑态度，或可能有点愤世嫉俗简论如何虚假似乎理念的一次旅行也要请访问加拿大的一些小镇的一座桥重开的答复。 阅读此文档布朗的声音:"当然，因为我们知道发生了什么事那里正确吗？ 但如果我们现正考虑时间旅行，我们怎么知道是否在其他时间轴中一些历史出事就在那里？ 」 事实上 ！ 一旦您考虑时间旅行，一切就改变了。 但之前编写好莱坞脚本，让我们回到现实，再问： 是的一次旅行照片证据吗？ 在 sourceAs 指出，图像是事实上可通过官方网站为加拿大的博物馆。 从 Bralorne 先锋，供市民自 2004 年以来，这是"及其近生活此处"图片展的一部分。 它是把在线自 2 月以来这一年也许在此之前。 与 3 — 这月底都当它链接如以上绝密和 FARK 的主网站仅获悉这奇特的"时间旅客"图像。 给定源，我们会假设这张照片是真实可信，并正确日期到 c.1940。 事实上，错误级别分析表明该图像不进行数字篡改或在最少的是它是否作者是足够聪明，在整件事规范化错误。 如果这是一份工作，这是一份好的工作。 并再次，给源，我们会认为不是一份工作。 因此，我们怎么解释出时间的人？ 00:19 編輯 ]

强人 00:19 編輯 ]

现代人？错，是PS处理！ 00:19 編輯 ]